|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
LETTERS ***************************************************************************** Reminder: Please send your letters using upper AND lower case, and remember to include your first and last name. Also please SPELL CHECK before sending. (WEDNESDAY) Ron:
Dear Ron:
On vacation from work last week, I watched a bit of morning
television. What I watched concerned me.
On "Good Day L.A.," Dorothy Lucey reported (in a
faux serious tone) that Bruce Springsteen was separated from his wife
and was now seeing a woman whose husband died on 9/11. The
story was presented as a news report with Fox 11 News graphics
displayed. On checking the story out on the Internet and by
watching other news programs, this story turned out to be not so
much as news, but as unsubstantiated gossip. In fact, on
Springsteen's website he has denied these "ugly rumors."
This incident concerns me in how "Good Day L.A." is
presented. It seems to me that the show is more gossip-driven
than news-driven. But to allow a show like that to use Fox news
graphics, have their talent's biographies filed under the news team on
the KTTV website, and use the same set as the 10:00 P.M. news, doesn't
this then breech some ethical kind standard for news?
For example, Ms. Lucey's report was based on gossip, and not news.
But the way it was presented made it look like it was a bona fide news
story. To me, this is wrong. If this or another story
based on gossip is reported shouldn't that be mentioned. Or ,
if this program is produced by the news division, shouldn't the
stories reported meet the standards set up by the news division. If
it isn't a news program, shouldn't there be some kind or disclaimer?
For example, CBS owns both a news division and "Entertainment Tonight."
Yet no one mistakes one for the other. "Entertainment
Tonight" is a gossip show that is not produced by the news
division, nor does the show use any of the resources of CBS News.
If that were to occur, don't you think people would be up in arms?
My main concern is the irresponsibility of Fox 11 News.
"Good Day L.A." is an entertainment show made to look like a
news program. In my opinion, that crosses an ethical line.
How can a show get away with reporting gossip as news. Wouldn't
that be grounds for some kind of libel action if an unsubstantiated
story was reported as fact?
For years, people have been saying news is now me "info-tainment"
than anything else, but "Good Day L.A." really blurs
that line. I guess this should be not surprise, since this is
that same station that produces the awful news on 13.
But it is a sad state of affairs in news if a show like this
tries to pass itself off as a news program when it's no more that
three hours of fluff and an ongoing commerical for the programs on
"MyNetwork."
Thanks for reading my ramblings/
Sincerely,
Tim Buckley
(After what they did with Dr. Phil last year, I would not put KCBS's ethics above anyone's in Los Angeles. And KCBS certainly has used video and information from their entertainment shows.- Ron )
As did many others, I tuned in Tuesday night out of
curiosity to see how Katie Couric would handle the CBS Evening News.
It was a disappointment. As expected, the show was all about
Katie. The news itself was clearly a secondary consideration.
Then there were all the cute Today show-style bells and whistles.
So, is the message that CBS didn't think Katie could cut it against
Brian Williams and Charles Gibson without the fun and games?
Sure seems that way. All I want from the news shows is the news
professionally researched, produced, directed, and reported.
So, I agree with Ron. Katie will become a distant third within a
few weeks and gone just as soon as CBS can get her out of contract.
Meanwhile, I'll be watching Charlie Gibson. He doesn't get in
front of the story. He understands news and his role. He's
just plain good at what he does. Katie should take a lesson from
him.
Ed Hain To Ron Fineman: (Thanks so much for note. The good news is, as of now -9pm Wed.- most of the pain has gone, at least for now. But all things considered, I've decided it would be wise to skip the Friday issue. Hopefully all will be well for Tuesday.-Ron)
|
||||||||||||
|
.
|