|
|
|||||||||||||
MAKING A DIFFERENCE A few weeks ago, OTR reader Allen Ba wrote a letter here about what sounded like a scam by a parking garage near the airport. The idea appeared to be to fool people into thinking it was one of the airport's public lots. Thanks OTR, the word got to the news media in LA. I know KCOP and KNBC did the story. Hal Eisner at KCOP was first to pick up on it, and his poking around led to the LA City Attorney's office to file charges against two private airport parking lots. All of that, because of one reader who took the time to vent here. Every once in a while, we can be source of news here, and I'm glad to help. ANTHRAX My general feeling is the news media have been handling this responsibly. I know there has been some misinformation. Early on, one station called it a virus. I haven't had much time to watch news this week, so I may've missed more. But certainly, you can't ignore it when these cases keep popping up. At this point, I think it would be wise to avoid reporting on "scares." It made sense at first, since people should know what sort of over-reaction we've been seeing. At this point, just like not reporting a bogus bomb threat phone call, we're all better served if we avoid the scares. And since they have been so commonplace, they're missing a key element of what qualifies as a news story. I floated the theory recently that maybe the anthrax letters were the result of right wing wackos, taking advantage of the fear of Islamic terrorists. But now, the conservative New York Post got one of these letters. Also, we've learned a couple of the letters included "Death to the United States. Death to Israel. Allah is great." Yet, one could throw that stuff in there, just for misdirection. Something about that "Allah is great" line (which we've heard in Arabic many times in the middle east) makes me suspicious. Yet, in light of the attacks on September 11th, and the millions of Muslims in the world who hate the United States, Islamists still seem to be the most likely perpetrators. THOSE ANTI-BIOTICS Hard to believe that some people are not only getting their hands on Cipro, just in case, but may be taking it. As was pointed out in a forum last night by LA County Public Health Director Dr Jonathan Fielding, doing that will build up an immunity to the drug. So then if you really need it, it won't work. Enough people doing that could create a "super bug" which would resistant to the drug. Dan Rather was right. The bigger problem here isn't the Anthrax...but the FEAR of it. WAR ON HOLIDAYS Last week, the US slowed down the attack in Afghanistan because of the Muslim Sabbath. Apparently we've done it again today. One interview yesterday, I heard the question raised whether we would stop attacking during Ramadan. I can only hope this is not a consideration. Do you suppose the terrorists would hesitate to attack on Christmas? Of course it was on Yom Kippur in 1973 when Arab countries attacked Israel. So let's just make sure we're living in the real world. Those who hate us won't hold their venom just because we slow down or stop on a holiday. If our war is just, we should finish it as soon as possible. WHO WAS THAT ANCHOR? It's been interesting seeing your guesses on which anchor re-read half of the same story as their co-anchor just finished reading. I could give the answer now...but I know all you TV watchers and those of you in the biz are used to extended teases, right? So....I'll tell you on Monday. In the meantime, keep those guesses coming. And so far I am impressed. Three people have guessed the right answer. HOW TO SPELL (O)(U)SAMA
I got an email today, asking about the two different spellings. Osama and Usama. This of course reminds me of the many ways we spell Ghadaffi - Khadaffi -Qaddafi. Arabic words don't directly translate into our alphabet, so it becomes a real judgment call. I don't think there is a sure right or wrong. PART ONE OF OUR FRIDAY INTERVIEW WITH HAL EISNER
Hal is a veteran LA TV reporter, currently working for KCOP. (1) OTR -You're in charge
of the APTRA Academy, where young people spend a weekend with
professionals, and get some hands on experience in TV reporting.
Why did you take this on? (2) OTR - What would you say are
the biggest misconceptions students have about (4) OTR - Let's hear about some
of those hair-pulling days. Maybe you could share a specific
incident or day, so that folks get a good idea of what it can be
like. NFL PICKS (8-10-2) It was getting to the point where I was considering calling on The Amazing Christina to do my picking for me. Pretty desperate for so early in the season. Of course she would automatically pick the Bears, thinking the only Bears to pick are from Cal. And needless to say, that would likely add another one to the loss column. But I did okay last week. I was 2-1-1...with the only loser being the Vikings, which let the Lions get close. Here is what I have for this week: Bengals vs Bears - 1 Packers vs Vikings - 3 Steelers vs Bucs + 5 1/2 Saints vs Falcons - 8 GO DESHAUN
Before the football season started, I don't remember even hearing DeShaun Foster's name mentioned as a possible Heisman Trophy winner. Didn't seem right to me. Now I'm reading that he may be the TOP contender. UCLA hasn't had a Heisman winner since Gary Beban in 1967. It's about time. But more important of course, is winning the National Title. I can remember when some other school in LA was considered the best football school. Funny, I can't even remember their name anymore. All I can remember is that their colors are red and yellow, and their school fabric is latex. WHILE WE'RE IN THE SPORTS MODE I get pretty tired of the Yankees winning in the post season. As a Braves fan, they've certainly earned a place in my heart, so to speak. Here the Mariners win 116 games in the season, and now they're down two games. Okay. I didn't think the Braves could get by the DBacks...after all, this was not a great year for Atlanta. But IF they can do it...I'd like to see them face the Yankees again. But they'd better win this time! Otherwise, let Arizona take em on. OTR ONE YEAR AGO THIS WEEK (10-18-00) THE DEBATE I thought the question about affirmative action was interesting. George W Bush described something he supports called "affirmative access." Al Gore said he didn't understand what that meant, and questioned Bush on whether he supported affirmative action. Bush said he didn't support Gore's version of it. When asked about the death penalty, Bush said he asks a couple of questions before deciding whether to delay the execution of a man. He said he supports the death penalty for those men if he can answer those two questions in the "affirmative." So I figure that must be Bush's idea of affirmative action. Okay, I'm just kidding to make an easy joke. I actually agree with George W on both of those issues (though I do think an LA Times article several months ago exposed some serious flaws in the Texas justice system). In fact while he and Gore both talked about their opposition to quotas, I think it would've been a better discussion if they talked about hiring "preferences" and government set-aside programs. As usual, Gore looked smarter, Bush looked nicer and I've now decided that I will vote in the election. I think I'll go with a protest vote for libertarian Harry Browne. Maybe, just maybe, if enough of us vote for people like Browne and Ralph Nader, the powers that be will get the message. TAKING IT TO FOX The Fox News Network has the rep of being biased toward Republicans. I haven't watched enough of it to form an opinion. But, it's obvious that Democratic Nevada Senator Harry Reid is in the 'decided' column on that question. This morning, he and Republican Senator Kit Bond were being interviewed about the debate. During the interview Reid accused the anchor/interviewer of supporting Bush. When Reid got the last word in the interview, the anchor said he's sure Bond would like to have responded. Reid then said that wouldn't be necessary, since the anchor was already speaking for Bush. It's a cliché to hear Republicans complain that all the other networks are biased toward Democrats, but I've never that sort of direct accusation during an interview on any of the other networks. CUT AND PASTE THE NEWS I can't be sure, but I have this feeling that someone in the KNBC newsroom took a story from their early morning news, and transplanted it word for word into their 11AM newscast. I got suspicious when Ana Garcia said "a dense fog advisory is in effect until nine this morning." She then ad-libbed that "of course that has passed." So, I have to wonder how that line gets read on the air. If the producer doesn't read the scripts, don't anchors pre-read them? Whatever the excuse, it sure sounds sloppy. MISS CLEO KNOWS ALL I have to admit, I get a kick out the tarot card commercials featuring Miss Cleo. That lady is good. She is a sitcom waiting to happen. On KCOP this week, they ran a story exposing what frauds these psychic readers are. What cracked me up was a line from a woman who had worked for one of these psychic hotline companies. The woman complained "there was no training." How do you train someone to be a psychic? And I suppose if there had been training, they'd be legit? MORE BAD COMMUNICATION On Monday I mentioned the problem of a live reporter being at a location different than where the anchor says they are. When I said it wasn't that unusual, I was more right than I realized. I saw it happen on two different stations yesterday, with the same story. On Both KCAL and KABC, the reporters were introduced as being in Pasadena for the MTA end of strike story, and in both cases they were somewhere else. And on KABC, like with KCOP last week, they just kept the wrong locator graphic on the screen. But after seeing this twice in one day, I'm wondering...do not reporters tell the producer when they've changed their location? Or is the foul-up on the inside? You know that cliché, about "we're in the communication business, but we don't communicate with each other." THAT IS SOME PERFUME! I've never had this happen before. I was at a stoplight, and next to me was a female driver in the left turn lane. Suddenly I realized that I could smell her perfume. Granted, there was breeze.... but car-to-car perfume? At least it smelled okay. I remember one woman where I worked had a perfume that smelled just like bug spray. It must've been called Real Kill #9. Even cigarette smoke would've been an improvement. KNOWING YOUR CROWD The majority of MTA drivers in Los Angeles are black and Latino. So I must say it seemed like an odd choice last week, when a band at an MTA membership meeting started off with a country song. They explained that it was an old union song, but I can tell you, it didn't energize the audience. However, there was one black guy near me who let out a big YE-HAW!, and then laughed. Of course there was more important business to take of, but it was hard not to notice the disconnect. QUOTE OF THE WEEK This came from James Williams, the leader of the bus drivers' union. After both sides reached an agreement, he said that Mayor Riordan gave him an autographed picture in which he said that Williams was one tough negotiator. Then Williams said "I'm going to frame it, and when I get mad, I'm going to have something to break." DETAILS, DETAILS We all know that you can't get the detail from TV that you can from the newspaper. And I know personally that covering the MTA strike wasn't always easy. But after the strike was settled I wondered what was in the contract. All KCOP told me was that the drivers got raises. Patrick Healy on KNBC did better, by giving us a percentage raise, and that there would be 380 part-timers added. Walter Richards also did better on KTLA, mentioning a small pay increase for the more experienced drivers, as well as more drivers working four day ten hour work weeks, and there was a pension increase. KABC had less detail, but did have one MTA board member saying they saved the money they've been insisting that they needed to save...which was a very big issue in all of this. KCAL mentioned a 9 percent raise over three years and a better pension plan. While a 9 percent-plus raise was in the MTA's final offer, the Times reports the union settled for 8.3 percent over three years. I'm going to guess that the Times got it right. From those I saw, I'd say KTLA and KNBC did the best on at least trying to explain what came out of a month's worth of strike negotiations. SHE SHOULD BE EMBARRASSED This is a little old, but worth mentioning, since I forget to bring it up sooner. During the last Lazio-Clinton debate, moderator Marcia Kramer asked them how they felt about a bill before Congress in which the Post Office would bill all of us five cents for each email we send! Well, there is NO SUCH bill. It's one of those internet hoaxes. Just on the face of it, it sounds pretty ridiculous. How could a moderate in a debate like that be so stupid?
YOUR OPINIONS They are an important part of OTR. Please send them along to BRUIN74@aol.com. Unless you say otherwise, I'll assume it is for publication.
Ron's disclaimer: Like all reporters I have opinions. I do the best I can to make sure that nothing I say here has any effect on my objectivity in covering stories.
|
||||||||||||||
Home | Letters | Archives | Inside LA TV | OTR Speaks | Poll | Links | Guestbook | Contact | About Ron